Judicial review and the law of the constitution

By:

Snowiss, Sylvia

Material type: Text

TextPublication details: Delhi; Universal Law; 1996Description: 228 pSubject(s):

Judicial review -United States

DDC classification:

347.7312 SNO

Summary: In this book, the author presents a new interpretation of the origin of judicial review. She traces the development of judicial review from American independence through the tenure of John Marshall as Chief Justice, showing that Marshall's role was far more innovative and decisive than has yet been recognized. According to the author all support for judicial review before Marshall contemplated a fundamentally different practice from that which we know today.

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode	Item holds
Books	Gandhi Smriti Library	347.7312 SNO (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available		84236

Total holds: 0

Browsing Gandhi Smriti Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available No cover image available	No cover image available No cover image available	No cover image available No cover image available	No cover image available No cover image available				Next
Previous	347.731 MEA American courts	347.7312 Kar Judicial review of public actions	347.7312 Kar Judicial review of public actions	347.7312 SNO Judicial review and the law of the constitution	347.7312 VER Judging under uncertainty: an institutional theory of legal interpretation	347.7314 OBR Judges on judging : views from the bench	347.7326 BAU 10th ed Supreme Court	Next

In this book, the author presents a new interpretation of the origin of judicial review. She traces the development of judicial review from American independence through the tenure of John Marshall as Chief Justice, showing that Marshall's role was far more innovative and decisive than has yet been recognized. According to the author all support for judicial review before Marshall contemplated a fundamentally different practice from that which we know today.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.