Work culture in the Indian context
Material type:
- 8170361966
- 306.3 SIN
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Gandhi Smriti Library | 306.3 SIN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 53419 |
Browsing Gandhi Smriti Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
No cover image available No cover image available |
![]() |
![]() |
No cover image available No cover image available |
![]() |
![]() |
||
306.3 GRI Sociology of work : | 306.3 HIC Social frame work : | 306.3 SIN Work culture in the Indian context | 306.3 SIN Work culture in the Indian context | 306.4 BUR New technology in context : | 306.4 CRE Agreement and innovation : | 306.4 EVE Everyday understanding : |
Why are employees in some organizations committed to work while their counterparts in others alienated from it? There are many answers to this universal question which vary from society to society. Yet the starting point for any answer must be an understanding of the immediate work environment, which is inextricably bound to the nature of the organi zation (e.g., ownership pattern, managerial policies, and trade unionism) as also to its socio-cultural context.
Based on a detailed empirical analysis of six large and differing organizations, this study provides an absorbing account of the work cultures prevailing in India. Even though the organizations studied have their own history and leadership styles, Prof. Sinha found that they all exhibited one of two work cultures which he terms 'soft' and 'synergetic' respectively.
In the former, work is displaced from its cen tral place in the life of the employees by non work activities and influences. The organiza tion is not perceived to be conducive to work while the management is felt to be pliant. In contrast, in a synergetic work culture, the management remains assertive, rewards hard work, and provides ample welfare measures. It cultivates good relations with the union and keeps the organization viable and vibrant. The same socio-cultural values which interfere with productivity in a soft work culture are deployed in a synergetic culture to facilitate work.
Prof Sinha relates his findings to the multina tional projects on Work Importance Studies (WIS) and The Meaning of Work (MOW). He demonstrates that the Japanese tradition of 'cooperation within and competition between' can feasibly be introduced in Indian organizations. Of particular importance is the manner in which the author highlights the pos sibility of building an organizational culture which is conducive for work by incorporating the basic features of the Indian socio-cultural reality rather than in spite of them. This important study will interest a wide range of scholars and professionals, particularly those concerned with social psychology, industrial relations, business management and organizational behavior.
There are no comments on this title.