Rural development programmes in India: an evaluation of integrated rural development programme
Material type:
- 307.72 BHA
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Gandhi Smriti Library | 307.72 BHA (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 48944 |
Browsing Gandhi Smriti Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The book in the existing context empirically evaluates, Integrated Rural Development Programme and also examines the important Rural Development Programmes in India viz: I.R.D.P., T.R.Y.S.E.M., N.R.E.P., R.L.E.G.P., Drought Prone Areas Programme, D.W.C.R.A. and Jawahar Rozgar Yojana etc.
The main conclusions emerging out from the study are: some beneficiaries were undoubtedly benefited from the schemes and were also able to improve their economic and social conditions as a result thereof but these beneficiaries belonged to that category of people, whose economic status was already better than many other people who really deserved to be covered under these schemes; the selection of the beneficiaries was not made strictly in accordance with the criteria and guidelines laid down by the Government in this regard; majority of the beneficiary households have received benefits from different schemes only after approaching Patwaries and Village Development Officers/Panchayat Adhi karies; the assistance provided to selected beneficiaries was inadequate; the beneficiaries were facing problems in regard to the purchase of inputs and a quick disposal of their products under the existing market mechanism; the arrangements for coordination of work between different agencies functioning were not adequate and effective; adequate arrangements for providing infrastructural support in terms of fodder, health care, marketing arrangements were some of the important flaws in the implementation of the I.R.D.P; administrative malpractices and other defects were cropping up only due to ignorance of the rural poor; lack of people's participation at different stages of the formation and execution of the programmes was the main problem of coordination between people and different agencies at work; and the local bureaucracy failed to inspire people's cooperation due to its rigid approach, conservatism and lack of developmental attitude.
There are no comments on this title.