Image from Google Jackets

Western sociologists on Indian society : Marx ,Spencer , Weber , Durkheim , Pareto

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: London; Routledge; 1979Description: 399pISBN:
  • 710087829
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 305.891411 Mad
Summary: Of the five major sociologists whose views on Indian society are assessed in this work, Marx and Weber made a special study of the subject and had something definite to say about the future of Indian society. Herbert Spencer was primarily concerned with the effects of colonial rule on India's progress, while Durkheim and Pareto tended to observe Indian society from a comparative point of view. However, as this study shows, all five sociologists touched on two special aspects of Indian society. Indian religion and the caste system. The other features of Indian society which they discussed in their various writings range widely from marriage and family structure, through village communities and the social structure of cities, to political organiza tion, the educational system, economic conditions, and the future progress of Indian society. Dr Madan demonstrates the correct ness of Marx's contention that the political subordination of India was the one great hindrance to the future progress of Indian society. He points out, though, that Marx failed to see clearly the effects of the caste system on economic development, and shows that this aspect was more correctly assessed by Max Weber. On the other hand, in Dr Madan's view Weber's observation that Indian religion was 'other-worldly and therefore a great obstacle to progress in Indian society lacked in cisiveness. By focusing on a neglected aspect of the writings of five of the great figures in sociology, the book gives a new insight into their work, and at the same time highlights many hitherto un recognized facets of India's complex social structure.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Of the five major sociologists whose views on Indian society are assessed in this work, Marx and Weber made a special study of the subject and had something definite to say about the future of Indian society. Herbert Spencer was primarily concerned with the effects of colonial rule on India's progress, while Durkheim and Pareto tended to observe Indian society from a comparative point of view. However, as this study shows, all five sociologists touched on two special aspects of Indian society. Indian religion and the caste system. The other features of Indian society which they discussed in their various writings range widely from marriage and family structure, through village communities and the social structure of cities, to political organiza tion, the educational system, economic conditions, and the future progress of

Indian society. Dr Madan demonstrates the correct ness of Marx's contention that the political subordination of India was the one great hindrance to the future progress of Indian society. He points out, though, that Marx failed to see clearly the effects of the caste system on economic development, and shows that this aspect was more correctly assessed by Max Weber. On the other hand, in Dr Madan's view Weber's observation that Indian religion was 'other-worldly and therefore a great obstacle to progress in Indian society lacked in cisiveness.

By focusing on a neglected aspect of the writings of five of the great figures in sociology, the book gives a new insight into their work, and at the same time highlights many hitherto un recognized facets of India's complex social structure.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha