Democratic paradox

By:

Mouffe, Chantal

Material type: Text

TextPublication details: London; Verso; 2009Description: 143pISBN:

9781844673551

Subject(s):

Democracy

DDC classification:

321.8 MOU

Summary: From the theory of ‘deliberative democracy’ to the politics of the ‘third way’, the present Zeitgeist is characterized by attempts to deny what Chantal Mouffe contends is the inherently conflictual nature of democratic politics. Far from being signs of progress, such ideas constitute a serious threat to democratic institutions. Taking issue with John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on one side, and the political tenets of Blair, Clinton and Schröder on the other, Mouffe brings to the fore the paradoxical nature of modern liberal democracy in which the category of the ‘adversary’ plays a central role. She draws on the work of Wittgenstein, Derrida, and the provocative theses of Carl Schmitt, to propose a new understanding of democracy which acknowledges the ineradicability of antagonism in its workings.

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode	Item holds
Books	Gandhi Smriti Library	321.8 MOU (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available		148710

Total holds: 0

Browsing Gandhi Smriti Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous								Next
Previous	321.8 LIJ Thinking about democracy: power sharing and majority rule in theory and practice	321.8 MAN Electing to fight: why emerging democracies go to war	321.8 MIL Delibration, social choice and absolutist democracy	321.8 MOU Democratic paradox	321.8 PET Democratic legitimacy	321.8 PRZ Democracy and the limits of self government	321.8 REW Rewriting democracy: cultural politics in postmodernity	Next

From the theory of ‘deliberative democracy’ to the politics of the ‘third way’, the present Zeitgeist is characterized by attempts to deny what Chantal Mouffe contends is the inherently conflictual nature of democratic politics. Far from being signs of progress, such ideas constitute a serious threat to democratic institutions. Taking issue with John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on one side, and the political tenets of Blair, Clinton and Schröder on the other, Mouffe brings to the fore the paradoxical nature of modern liberal democracy in which the category of the ‘adversary’ plays a central role. She draws on the work of Wittgenstein, Derrida, and the provocative theses of Carl Schmitt, to propose a new understanding of democracy which acknowledges the ineradicability of antagonism in its workings.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.