National responsibility and global justice
Material type:
- 9780199235056
- 341.482 MIL
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Gandhi Smriti Library | 341.482 MIL (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 134376 |
Browsing Gandhi Smriti Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
No cover image available No cover image available |
![]() |
![]() |
||
341.48102657 CHI China : the truth about its human rights record | 341.4810601 OBE Global human rights institutions | 341.4810954 PUJ Politics of human rights in South Asia | 341.482 MIL National responsibility and global justice | 341.484 GUR Law of Foreigners citizenship and Passports in India | 341.4858 MAC Are women human? and other international dialogues | 341.486 DAV Legitimising rejection |
This chapter addresses the questions: what responsibilities do we have towards the global poor? What must we do for them as a matter of justice? It considers the arguments of Peter Singer and Thomas Pogge that responsibility for global poverty falls straightforwardly on the citizens of rich, developed societies. Against Peter Singer, it is argued that it makes no sense to assign remedial responsibility for poverty to citizens of rich states without first considering the question of outcome responsibility — how and why poverty has arisen. Against Thomas Pogge, it is argued that his attempt to assign outcome responsibility for poverty to the international order, and through that to citizens of rich states and their governments, is implausible. It is shown that remedial responsibilities to the world's poor are not straightforward, but must take into account a variety of factors, primarily having to do with attributions of outcome responsibility for the poverty we witness.
There are no comments on this title.