"Globalization and deregulation: ideas, interests and institutional change in India"
Material type:
- 9780198096177
- 330.954053 MUK
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Gandhi Smriti Library | 330.954053 MUK (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 158014 |
Browsing Gandhi Smriti Library shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
330.954 STA State - level reforms in India | 330.954 TOM v.3.3 Economy of modern India 1860-1970 | 330.954035 NEW New Economic history of Colonial India | 330.954053 MUK "Globalization and deregulation: ideas, interests and institutional change in India" | 330.95413 JEN Poverty and underdevelopment in tribal areas: a geographical analyses | 330.95414 MUK Merchants and companies in Bengal | 330.954552 SIN Federalism, nationalism and development: India and the Punjab economy |
Globalization and Deregulation makes a contribution to the literature on economic change by exploring the institutional transition from state-led import substitution to deregulation and globalization in the world's most populous democracy-India. It proposes a largely internally driven 'tipping-point' model of economic change, which is in sharp contrast to the 'punctuated equilibrium' model of sudden exogenous shocks that drive transformations.
Indian economists have provided excellent arguments about the need for change and have described changes that have occurred. This literature is essential for understanding how new economic ideas are born. But it does not explain the process of economic change, which is a political process.
The best accounts of India's political economy explain why the institutions of government intervention within a closed economy were locked in a closed economy model. These accounts reveal why the dominant interest groups made political demands with substantial fiscal consequences. They do not engage with the issue of change. This book fills that gap by seriously engaging with India's economic history and the literature on institutional change. It is a contribution both to India's economic history and to systematic ways of thinking about economic change.
There are no comments on this title.