Image from Google Jackets

Can we end the cold war?; Study in American foreign policy

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: New York; Macmillan Company; 1960Description: xii, 251 pSubject(s): DDC classification:
  • 327.73 PER
Summary: This is a challenging and timely book. In this era of world revolu tion it extends the boundaries of our thinking beyond the mechanics of disarmament to a moral imperative which is the only sure basis of a world community. That imperative is a single standard of morals for nations as for individuals. With convincing argument, richly documented from history, the case is made against that double standard which distorts and falsifies human relationships by projecting the strategy of war into the conditions of peace. The fallacy of such shadowy reflections of Machiavellian policy is evi dent in any such analysis of politics as this, yet it continues to find support in both academic and political circles. The reason for this, the one which lies in the background of this survey, is the fact that down to the present, the final argument of nations, as formerly of kings and princes, has been war and that in a world of real or poten tial enemies there can be no true community of interest. The double standard is the strategy of an insecure world.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Books Books Gandhi Smriti Library 327.73 PER (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 13100
Total holds: 0

This is a challenging and timely book. In this era of world revolu tion it extends the boundaries of our thinking beyond the mechanics of disarmament to a moral imperative which is the only sure basis of a world community. That imperative is a single standard of morals for nations as for individuals. With convincing argument, richly documented from history, the case is made against that double standard which distorts and falsifies human relationships by projecting the strategy of war into the conditions of peace. The fallacy of such shadowy reflections of Machiavellian policy is evi dent in any such analysis of politics as this, yet it continues to find support in both academic and political circles. The reason for this, the one which lies in the background of this survey, is the fact that down to the present, the final argument of nations, as formerly of kings and princes, has been war and that in a world of real or poten tial enemies there can be no true community of interest. The double standard is the strategy of an insecure world.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha