Bank nationalization and the Supreme Court judgment (Record no. 2031)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02141nam a2200181Ia 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20220507174103.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 200202s9999 xx 000 0 und d
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 332.1223 BAN
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Singhvi, L. M. (ed.)
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Bank nationalization and the Supreme Court judgment
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Delhi
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. National Publishing House
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 1971
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 274 p.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The Parliament and the State Legislatures enact legislation within the ambit and sphere of their legislative power. Frequen tly the High Courts and the Supreme Court are called upon to interpret the laws and to examine their validity. The power to interpret legislation, to review it and to pass on its validity or otherwise is a crucial power vested in the higher judiciary for securing orderly government. When the Legislature legislates, it performs a function which is confided to it by the Constitu tion; when the Supreme Court finally interprets a piece or provi sion of legislation and gives its verdict on its validity or other wise, it finally determines the status, effect and meaning of the enactment and its various provisions. The verdict of the Supreme Court may or may not meet with the approval or the concur rence of the other organs of Government or that of public opi nion. The point is that in the democratic process under a written Constitution, there should be proper comity between the diffe rent organs of the Government. It is in this context that the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Bank Nationalization case may appropriately be discussed. Within the limits of pro priety and with all due respect for the Supreme Court, it is quite permissible for us to try and understand what the Supreme Court has laid down, what the judgment implies, what its repercussions are likely to be and how consistent and rational that pronouncement is. Implicit respect for the judiciary is an obligation of civilized citizenship. It does not however take away the right of the citizen or the legislator to make fair, informed and concerned comments on judicial decisions.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Banks and banking India
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Books
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Source of acquisition Total checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
  Not Missing Not Damaged   Gandhi Smriti Library Gandhi Smriti Library 2020-02-02 MSR   332.1223 BAN 2271 2020-02-02 2020-02-02 Books

Powered by Koha