Ctrl + Z : the right to be forgotten (Record no. 179369)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02059nam a2200193Ia 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20220325162110.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 200208s9999 xx 000 0 und d
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9781479881703
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 323.448094 JON
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name "Jones, Meg Leta"
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Ctrl + Z : the right to be forgotten
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. New York
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. New York University Press
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2016
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 269
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. A gripping insight into the digital debate over data ownership, permanence and policy "This is going on your permanent record!" is a threat that has never held more weight than it does in the Internet Age, when information lasts indefinitely. The ability to make good on that threat is as democratized as posting a Tweet or making blog. Data about us is created, shared, collected, analyzed, and processed at an overwhelming scale. The damage caused can be severe, affecting relationships, employment, academic success, and any number of other opportunities-and it can also be long lasting. One possible solution to this threat? A digital right to be forgotten, which would in turn create a legal duty to delete, hide, or anonymize information at the request of another user. The highly controversial right has been criticized as a repugnant affront to principles of expression and access, as unworkable as a technical measure, and as effective as trying to put the cat back in the bag. Ctrl breaks down the debate and provides guidance for a way forward. It argues that the existing perspectives are too limited, offering easy forgetting or none at all. By looking at new theories of privacy and organizing the many potential applications of the right, law and technology scholar Meg Leta Jones offers a set of nuanced choices. To help us choose, she provides a digital information life cycle, reflects on particular legal cultures, and analyzes international interoperability. In the end, the right to be forgotten can be innovative, liberating, and globally viable. <br/>
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Right to be forgotten--United States
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Books
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
  Not Missing Not Damaged   Gandhi Smriti Library Gandhi Smriti Library   2020-02-08   323.448094 JON 160172 2020-02-08 2020-02-08 Books

Powered by Koha