000			01917nam a2200169Ia 4500
999			_c7396 _d7396
005			20220328193310.0
008			200202s9999 xx 000 0 und d
082			_a327.2 Rew
100			_aRewadikar, Nalini
245		0	_aConference diplomacy Austrian model: a study of the dynamics of negotiations and disengagement of big powers
260			_aMeerut
260			_bMeenakshi Prakashan
260			_c1973
300			_a212 p.
520			_aThe phenomenon of conflict is one of the distinctive features of human interaction and world politics-interaction among nations is no exception. Conflict, being discord, is meaningful only when it is resolved, creating some sort of harmony. As Kenneth Boulding points out, it is the process of conflict towards some sort of resolution which gives it meaning. Settling disputes through deployment of physical power leading to conquest is no longer a rational solution in the thermonuclear setting of modern world politics. Some sort of reconciliation and compromise is, therefore, sought for by conflicting parties through the process of negotiation at a green table by means of argument, discussion, debate, mediation, arbitration etc. The conflict over Austria, involving the Big Four during the decade immediately after the Second World War, is one of those rare cases which were resolved through the process of negotiation. In this process each party agreed to settle for something less than its ideal position rather than to continue the conflict. Although certain fundamental negotiating strategies and tactics of the Big Four could be identified in every negotiation situation, the Austrian model unfolds certain distinctive features peculiar to itself. Besides the crucial decision of the Big Four to take a trial step towards detente on a significant geographical location in Europe,Felix Austria' stands out clearly projected in this context.
942			_cB _2ddc