| 000 | 00949nam a2200217Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c231746 _d231746 |
||
| 005 | 20211202112958.0 | ||
| 008 | 200208s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 020 | _a9780195342291 | ||
| 082 | _a174.3 BRA | ||
| 100 | _a"Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey" | ||
| 245 | 0 | _aLimits of legality | |
| 260 | _aOxford | ||
| 260 | _bO.U.P | ||
| 260 | _c2010 | ||
| 300 | _a354p. | ||
| 365 | _b9000 | ||
| 365 | _dRS | ||
| 520 | _aThis book explain the Judges sometimes hear cases in which the law, as they honestly understand it, requires results that they consider morally objectionable. Most people assume that, nevertheless, judges have an ethical obligation to apply the law correctly, at least in reasonably just legal systems. This is the view of most lawyers, legal scholars, and private citizens, but the arguments for it have received surprisingly little attention from philosophers. | ||
| 650 | _aJudicial ethics-United States | ||
| 942 |
_cB _2ddc |
||