000			01216nam a2200193Ia 4500
999			_c230239 _d230239
005			20211125161511.0
008			200208s9999 xx 000 0 und d
020			_a81302201321
082			_a149.1 GIL
100			_a"Gill, Harjeet Singh"
245		0	_aConceptualism in budhhist and french traditions
260			_aPatiala
260			_bPunjabi university
260			_c2007
300			_a211p.
520			_aThe natural versus social origin of language controversy perpetuated two distinct traditions of linguistic reflection in India. Bhartrhari stated in no uncertain terms that the correspondence between the word and what it designates is fixed for all times and no human intervention can change this relationship. Panini's great treatise, as adhyaya, and Bhartrhari's sphota continued to be the main tradition of formal linguistics in India. The Buddhist proposition of language as social phenomenon where it is the human, conscious perception that determines its various modes and realisations of conceptual constructs became the basis of all speculation on language as generator of significations. Dignaga and Dharmalurti were its foremost logicians.
650			_aConceptualism
942			_cB _2ddc