000			02448nam a2200193Ia 4500
999			_c162355 _d162355
005			20220812163805.0
008			200208s9999 xx 000 0 und d
020			_a815782276
082			_a342.7304 SUN
100			_aSundquist, James L.
245		0	_aConstitutional reform and effective government
260			_aWashington
260			_bBrookings Institution
260			_c1986
300			_a262p.
520			_aAs the United States prepares to celebrate the bicenten nial of its Constitution, many experienced statesmen and thoughtful scholars are raising questions about the adequacy for contemporary times of the institutional structure created by that grand document. The division of policymaking authority among three centers of power the presidency, the Senate, and the House provides a safeguard against hasty and ill-considered action, as the framers intended. But that division can also lead to debilitating conflict that renders the government incapable of dealing with critical problems in a timely and decisive manner. Those who believe that the govern ment is too prone to stalemate and deadlock have suggested a broad range of institutional changes designed to encourage a greater degree of harmony between the executive and legislative branches. In this book, James L. Sundquist reviews the framers' rationale in creating the country's unique constitutional structure and then ana lyzes various proposals for altering that structure or the relationships among its institutional elements. He identifies three problems as fundamental. First, the electoral system commonly leads to divided control of the executive and legislative branches between the two major parties, making policy conflict and deadlock all but inevitable. Second, the short interval of only two years between national elections tends to preoccupy presidents and legislators alike with the always imminent next election, and to limit to only a few months every four years the "window of opportunity" for dealing with pressing matters free from electoral distraction. Third, the absence of a workable mechanism for replacing a government that has palpably failed, for any of a wide range of possible reasons, permits what may be a dangerously long wait until the next regularly scheduled election. In his analysis, the author emphasizes feasible remedial measures to alleviate or resolve these problems.
650			_aConstitutions.
942			_cDB _2ddc