03149nam a22001937a 45000010002000000030004000020050017000060080041000230400006000640820019000701000023000892450030001122600064001423000010002065202596002169420011028129520113028239990019029360OSt20260805140625.0260804b        |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  c0  aH 891.4309 SIN  aSingh, Sudha 9305  aStri lekhan ki vaichariki  aNew DelhibAnamika Publishers & Distributors (P) Ltd.c2025  a371p.  aThis book on the ideology of women's writing represents a modest attempt to foster an understanding of women and their literary contributions. Issues concerning the female perspective, women's ideology, and the realities of women's lives have yet to become central themes in Hindi literature, history, and criticism. A significant section of Hindi critics remains preoccupied with subjects rooted in patriarchal discourse—topics where women are either absent or relegated to the margins. This group encompasses critics from progressive, reactionary, and liberal factions alike. The challenge of developing literary criticism from a female perspective persists to this day. It will be fascinating to observe the shifts in interpretation and conclusion that such an approach might bring to literary history and criticism. For now, however, it must be acknowledged that women's issues and perspectives do not yet form the core of Hindi criticism. This book aids in observing, exploring, and understanding women, their writings, and the portrayal of women in the works of various authors. The process of interpreting literature, history, and culture from a female perspective has already begun. The book grounds its discussion in the nineteenth-century social reform movements and the Renaissance, as well as the turbulent political events of the twentieth century—identifying and centering women's writing and women's issues amidst imperialist oppression, the rise of nationalism, and the lingering remnants of feudal values. Readers will see how this perspective transforms the understanding of familiar events and their consequences. The "woman question"—along with the scope, quality, and extent of women's writing—should be viewed as a central issue rather than a marginal one; attitudes of neglect, denial, or disdain will not be helpful in the long run. Whether critics choose to engage with the subject or highlight these works is immaterial—the fact remains that women's writing exists. By ignoring or dismissing the issue of women—rather than engaging with it—only a one-sided form of criticism develops; this is precisely what has happened in Hindi. By refusing to acknowledge the "woman question" as a legitimate issue, critics and historians seek to evade a profound social reality; yet, questions concerning women are socio-cultural and political in nature and ought to be a vital part of academic discourse. Placing women's writings at the center of analysis could potentially lead to a significant re-evaluation of the conclusions drawn by historians.
Send feedback  2ddccB  00102ddc4070aLBSNAAbLBSNAAd2026-08-04g1200.00l0oH 891.4309 SINp181275r2026-08-04w2026-08-04yBA  c361833d361833